Virtual Mentor. December 2003, Volume 5, Number 12.
Is There More to Medical School than Grades?
Clinical case conferences are an important component to the medical school curriculum due to the critical thinking skills that are encouraged to develop.
Commentary by Gregory Lopez and Mel Rosenfeld, PhD
Throughout college, Joshua got A's in classes by cramming for his exams. Now in his first semester of medical school, he finds this study strategy is still working reasonably well for him. In fact, he has scored close to the class average on all of his exams so far—anatomy, physiology, genetics, and cell biology. He makes it a point to attend every lecture so he can take notes on what he believes to be the "core concepts" the lecturer is trying to convey. He then studies from his notes in marathon, all-night study sessions starting 3 days before the exam. Consequently, his study strategy involves ignoring most of the smaller details since they'd be impossible to cram before the exam. He is a little concerned about skipping these details but figures "it's med school and I need to do whatever is necessary to survive." After all, his grades so far have proven to him that knowing the core concepts is enough to get by.
Despite his avid interest in lectures, Joshua does not like attending small group conferences where 10 to 12 students discuss case studies or basic science vignettes in an interactive, problem-solving format. He thinks the conferences are a waste of time since they don't focus on the "core concepts," and he usually forgets all of the minutiae discussed there by the week of the test anyway. He particularly dislikes the cell bio conferences, which he considers useless and impractical. He regularly complains to other students that "the bio conference is stupid. Why does a medical doctor need to know anything about signaling molecules or G-proteins? This won't ever help me care for my patients."
Joshua knows that the cell bio conference material constitutes only a small part of the final exam. If he skipped the conference, he thinks he could still pass the course without a problem. Still, he shows up for conferences since attendance is taken. He refuses to prepare for the case vignette discussion questions because it requires "a lot of work for little return." In conference, he constantly pretends to search through his notes to avoid eye contact and dodge being called on. The few times he was asked to contribute to the discussion, he joked his way out of having to provide an answer. And when the group discussion heads off on a tangent, he shows his disapproval and lack of interest by placing his head on the table. Other students avoid including him in the discussion since they know he never has anything to contribute and likes to make cynical comments under his breath about their interest in "boring details." Joshua's only pleasure comes from knowing that at the end of the semester he will have an opportunity to critique the cell bio conference thoroughly so future students won't have to suffer through it like he did.
by Gregory J. Lopez
Higher learning can teach some strange lessons. As an undergraduate, I majored in biology. My college roommate, who is now a painter, majored in anthropology. We chose our majors because we found them to be interesting vehicles for developing our abilities to think about problems. But along the way to graduation, we lost sight of our noble goals. One night, after some heady dinner conversation, our stomachs knotted as we realized that we could have read a library of books on interesting, related topics, but the quantification of our "knowledge" would ultimately be summarized by 1 of 5 letters on a grade sheet outside the professor's office. The primacy of "key concepts" on our final evaluation was reinforced so many times that we became obsessed with them. By senior year, my peers would ask the professors in review sessions, "Will this be on the test?"
College students become experts at culling through large volumes of material, figuring out what is testable and discarding the rest. College students who become medical students are among of the best of them.
Joshua is obviously a very bright and talented student. With minimal effort he obtained A's on his college exams and, because the preclinical years resemble college, he is approaching them in a similar manner. Unfortunately for Joshua, medical training is very different from college coursework. The goal of medical school classes is not solely to develop an ability to think, but to apply that ability to a fund of knowledge and heal patients. Cramming is a horrible way to develop that fund of knowledge. A complete review of the literature on long-term recall is beyond the scope of this piece. But, aside from countless psychiatry and neurology texts and articles, a recent study using computer-timed, web-based teaching modules attempted to validate "the hypothesis that learning takes time"  and succeeded. The bottom line: for lifelong learning, cramming is poor practice.
That said, Joshua may find himself in something of a bind. Between anatomy lab, lectures, and assigned reading, perhaps he just doesn't have time to adequately prepare for his conferences. Even Sir William Osler noted at the beginning of the last century, "The student needs more time for quiet study, fewer classes, fewer lectures, and above all, he needs the incubus of examinations lifted from his soul" . Sadly, modern medical school has done seemingly the opposite. If we accept the "hypothesis" that learning takes time, just how much can Joshua learn in the preclinical years? The science, techniques, and skills that must be learned by young physicians today have grown tremendously in the past 20 years. Could we even have conceived of a DNA chip 20 years ago?
The Principles of Medical Ethics put forth by the American Medical Association in June 2001 call on the physician to, "continue to study, apply, and advance scientific knowledge" . The Prayer of Maimonides pleads, "Let me be contented in everything except the great science of my profession. Never allow the thought to arise in me that I have attained to sufficient knowledge… For art is great, but the mind of man is ever expanding" . In the Islamic Code of Medical Ethics the physician swears, "to strive in the pursuit of knowledge and harnessing it for the benefit, but not the harm of mankind" . For 310 years (the earliest written copies of the Prayer of Maimonides date back to 1793) we can find codified the idea that the practice of medicine is intimately entwined with an evolving body of scientific knowledge. Advances in the basic sciences virtually guarantee that standard-of-care today will not be standard-of-care tomorrow. Joshua's desire to grasp just the "core concepts" will be incompatible with the reality of his practice in the future.
A shift in Joshua's thinking must occur.He does not want to do a "lot of work for little return" because he knows that the test will not quantify his knowledge and skills. And he is right. But the medical classroom is not about preparing for the test, it is about preparing To join a profession. It is learning with application. Small groups, although they look like sections of large college lecture courses, have a greater goal. Virtually all the codes of ethics mentioned above emphasize learning from peers and sharing of knowledge as core values of the medical profession. Small group sessions are the medical students' first chances to develop the communication style and interpersonal skills to do so. Communication with peers will occur not just in the basic sciences; there will be tumor boards, consults, and journal clubs which, if performed with a love of learning, will enrich Joshua's medical practice and enhance the health of his patients. That will be the measure of his success.
Sir William Osler noted, "The hardest conviction to get into the mind of a beginner is that the education upon which he is engaged is not a college course, not a medical course, but a life course, for which the work of a few years under teachers is but a preparation" . The second word of the title "medical student" lulls many young physicians into their old ways and motivations. Only when Joshua realizes that he must be a physician first and a student always, will he find satisfaction in his studies.
Gregory Lopez is a fourth-year medical student at the NYU School of
by Mel Rosenfeld, PhD
As a faculty member and frequent facilitator of small group conferences across the curriculum, reading this case puts me in the moment: I have just finished 17 grueling weeks of lab, lecture, conference, and small groups, in anatomy, and it is finally over. The faculty is really beat. I know students think it's easy for us. But, trust me, we are just as exhausted as they are, and we're older with a longer refractory period. I remember what it was like being a student taking anatomy, biochemistry, etc, and teaching is so much harder.
In any event, it's January and I move from the anatomy lab to my role as a small group leader for the cell biology course. Even though I am a member of the Cell Biology Department, today's case study is "outside" my area of research expertise. In an effort to prepare, I review a large loose-leaf binder filled with review articles, clinical information, and basic science data. After mastering the core material, our faculty meets for a few hours to discuss the case in detail and decide on the key concepts that we want our students to understand. It takes a few days for me to prepare for this small group encounter, but I make sure that I am ready before facing the students.
I look forward to these small group conferences because they allow me to engage very intelligent students in a way that is impossible in a large lecture hall or on a multiple-choice exam. I can actually get my students to "think" about a problem instead of just regurgitating information they have memorized from a textbook or lecture notes. Critical thinking is, after all, what medical school is about, integrating what appears to be disparate information into a testable hypothesis. One of my medical school professors once told me that half of the information I was learning would be wrong in 10 years. While not exactly correct, the point was well taken. We can't teach our students everything they will have to know in order to practice medicine. But what defines us as successful educators is teaching our students how to become lifelong learners. So, with donuts in hand (food never hurts) I eagerly head off to my small group conference room anticipating an intellectually exciting experience.
Every conference starts with a review of a clinical case written to highlight the role of basic science in day-to-day medical practice. I encourage participation from all group members, and when I ask Joshua a question, it is clear that he has not bothered to prepare for this conference. While the rest of the group has worked hard to prepare for our encounter, Joshua blew it off. With his head down to avoid eye contact, he tries to evade being called upon. And when he is questioned, he tries to "escape" with a joke. Coming unprepared to conference upsets me because of all the time and effort I put in to "learn" the material.
Joshua feels he does not need to know anything about signaling molecules or G proteins. He is correct–if he is going to practice 19th century medicine. Now he is in the 21st century, and the molecular biology revolution is about to pass him by. While it would be very easy for me to embarrass Joshua, what would that really accomplish? Joshua has let the "team" down!
The whole concept behind small group exercises is to have the students work together, just as they will in their clinical clerkships. They are part of a team whether in a basic science course or on the wards. Ideally, after the conference, Joshua's classmates will have a chat with him, which will have greater effect and will be taken more seriously than my berating him in front of his peers.
I think it appropriate for his classmates to emphasize how disappointed they are in him, how they had worked hard to prepare for the case presentation,
Students like Joshua have some growing up to do. Contrary to what Joshua may think, he is not in the best position to "know" what will or will not be important for him to learn in order to practice medicine. The faculty spends hundreds of hours revamping the curriculum so that it will prepare him both to practice medicine in the 21st century and to become a lifelong learner.
Despite Joshua's behavior, I thoroughly enjoyed my small group experience. I made my students excited about basic science and how relevant it is to the disease process. They made me think; I made them think. What more could a teacher ask of his students?
Melvin G. Rosenfeld, PhD, has been a faculty member at NYU School of Medicine for almost 20 years. He teaches gross anatomy, embryology, and cell biology and is director of the histology course for first-year medical students. He has a PhD in cell biology from the State University of New York.
The people and events in this case are fictional. Resemblance to real events or to names of people, living or dead, is entirely coincidental. The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the AMA.
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.