Virtual Mentor. July 2004, Volume 6, Number 7.
Physicians must respond responsibly and ethically when a patient who has an exercise addiction requests unnecessary diagnostic tests to support her unhealthy lifestyle.
Commentary by Mona M. Shangold, MD, and Suzanne Hecht, MD
Mrs. Cassidy Kellogg appeared to be in good physical condition, sitting on the exam table, engrossed in marking a series of papers with a red pencil. Internist Dana Haselton had seen Mrs. Kellogg twice before, each time for a well-woman check-up. Dr. Haselton glanced at the patient record and saw that it was not yet time for Mrs. Kellogg's third annual check-up. Looking over the record quickly, she saw that her patient was 36 years old, married, and a university professor and that she was in the office today to "check on her heart." Mrs. Kellogg's height, weight and blood pressure, as recorded by the nurse minutes before, were 68 in, 133 lbs, and 90 over 60, respectively.
"How have you been since your last visit?" Dr. Haselton asked.
"I'm fine. I just want you to check out my heart. The other night I woke up in the middle of the night, and when I stood up to go into the bathroom, I got really dizzy." I want to make sure my heart's okay, because I work out pretty regularly."
"That could be from several things," Dr. Haselton said. Your blood pressure is low—which is good—but that could contribute to the dizziness you report. How often do you work out?"
"Every day. A couple of hours every day."
"Tell me about your exercise program."
Mrs. Kellogg reported that she went to one gym—a women's gym, with machines—in the morning before school and then did some "more serious work" after school: machines, free weights, calisthenics. If she felt like it, she would run 2 or 3 nights a week and do longer runs on weekends.
"That's quite an exercise program," said Dr. Haselton. Referring to the chart to check on her patient's marital status, Dr. Haselton asked, "Does your husband work out with you?"
"No. They have a fit—John and the kids. I'm at the gym early in the morning and then at the other gym or running when they have dinner, not that I'd eat what they eat anyway."
Upon further questioning, it turned out that John Kellogg made dinner for himself and the kids. But Mrs. Kellogg stuck to her protein shakes, yogurt, and grains, occasionally eating a bite of salad or fish with the family.
"If I ate like they do, I'd be big as a house," said Dr. Haselton's tall patient with well-defined muscles and no body fat that one could pinch between the fingers.
"What's the highest your weight has ever been?" asked Dr. Haselton.
"I weighed almost 151 when I was pregnant," came the reply. "Both pregnancies. It was disgusting. But we're way off track, here." Mrs. Kellogg sounded impatient. I just want an EKG to see whether my heart's all right. If I can't work out, I'll die. When can you schedule the EKG?
by Mona M. Shangold, MD
In the past, patients presented with only a symptom and challenged the doctor to find signs, order tests, pinpoint diagnoses, and recommend treatment. It is not unusual now for patients to present presumptive diagnoses, request certain tests, and demand specific therapy. While a physician may welcome a patient's helpful clue, demands for unnecessary and inappropriate services will certainly present a physician with challenges that add the need for diplomacy and ethics to the requisite art and science of practicing medicine.
In the present case, Mrs. Kellogg is exercising excessively, to her own detriment and that of her family. She has requested that Dr. Haselton order an EKG—a simple request that could be much more easily granted than challenged. Dr. Haselton, however, has an obligation to do what is in Mrs. Kellogg's best interest, not what she requests. Although it will be more difficult and time-consuming, Dr. Haselton should (1) explain to Mrs. Kellogg why an alternative plan for evaluation is more appropriate and (2) discuss why her excessive exercise program is detrimental both to her and her family. Some patients will accept and appreciate this care and counseling. Others will not and will, in return, either send angry letters to their insurance carriers or file lawsuits against the physician. These risks make the physician's responsibilities even more challenging and dangerous.
Address the Real Problem
The symptom of dizziness, although in need of evaluation, is probably of less long-term importance than the underlying disease causing the exercise addiction and will probably be more easily evaluated and treated than the exercise addiction and its cause. While some women develop an exercise addiction when attempting to control or lose weight, many acquire this addiction while treating themselves for unrecognized psychopathology, such as depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or eating disorders. The unrecognized and often denied nature of these disorders make them very difficult and time-consuming to address.
Although it can be anticipated that Mrs. Kellogg (1) will deny that she has an exercise addiction, (2) will try to avoid discussing it, and (3) will resist all suggestions that she has either an exercise addiction or underlying psychopathology, it is necessary to confront the real problem, rather than merely the presenting symptom. In fact, the presence of this symptom provides a unique opportunity to discuss the underlying problem.
Many strategies can be employed to raise the issue. To determine which will be most successful, it is usually helpful to begin with a casual conversation, seeking clues about Mrs. Kellogg's interests, values, and responsibilities. A few minutes of casual talk often provide ideas and windows of opportunity that will permit Dr. Haselton to identify the best points to bring up in order to convince Mrs. Kellogg that she is exercising excessively. It is likely that the easiest and fastest way to convince her to exercise less is by suggesting that a reduction in exercise will probably enable her to continue exercising, while continuing to exercise excessively will ultimately require her to stop altogether, thereby appealing primarily to her strong desire to exercise. While this leads to rapid short-term gain, it ignores the underlying psychopathology, which probably requires long-term talk therapy by a trained specialist, or pharmacologic therapy, or both.
When to Say No
It is not unusual for patients to ask their doctors to authorize tests, treatment, or special accommodations. In some cases, patients may truly, but erroneously, believe these requests are appropriate. In others, they are aware that they are asking a physician to use his or her authority inappropriately for their financial or personal benefit.
Physicians have ethical responsibilities not only to their patients, but also to insurance carriers, employers, and society. They should not lend legitimacy to patients' unreasonable requests fraudulently. When a physician complies with a patient's demand for unnecessary tests or treatment or both, the resulting services generally carry a cost, to an insurer, the government (and hence, society), or the patient herself or himself. Cost aside, a doctor who abdicates responsibility by permitting a patient to dictate orders is acting unethically. More commonly, the patient expects others to pay for these services—her insurance carrier, her employer, or society. When a doctor writes a note excusing a patient from work, the cost of this unethical act is passed on to the patient's employer, who must pay the employee to do no work and may have to pay someone else to do the work. Ordering unnecessary tests or treatment initially increases costs to the insurance carrier and eventually raises the costs of premiums paid by employers and individuals, ultimately elevating health care costs to society.
Physicians must remember their responsibilities to do what is appropriate and ethical, even when confronted by demanding or threatening patients. Although it may be tempting to follow the easy route of granting the patient's wishes or demands, especially when refusal to do so carries the risk of angry letters and lawsuits, physicians must have the conviction, courage, and conscience to do what is right.
Mona M. Shangold, MD, is director of The Center for Women's Health and Sports Gynecology in Philadelphia, Pa. She has written extensively on the reproductive effects of exercise and other aspects of gynecology and sports medicine.
by Suzanne Hecht, MD
Dr. Kellogg's complaint of lightheadness appears to be the tip of the iceberg. From her history it is clear that she has restrictive eating patterns and likely uses excessive exercise as a way to control her weight. She may realize this at some level or she may actually think that she is practicing a "healthy lifestyle." Her comments regarding her weight gain during her pregnancies are alarming, since her weight gain was minimal. Her multiple daily workouts and eating practices at the expense of her family time are also "red flags." Her history suggests that these behaviors may be habitual at this point. These behaviors may be hard to change, particularly if the patient is not ready or willing to accept that her "healthy lifestyle" may actually be harming her and her family.
The Female Athlete Triad
Is she actually harming herself with these behaviors or is she just ultrahealthy? It is hard to say without more history, but based on the information we have, we can surmise that she has disordered eating at a minimum and possibly a full-blown eating disorder. Disordered eating (including true eating disorders) is one of the 3 components of the female athlete triad. The triad consists of 3 interrelated but distinct conditions: disordered eating, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, and osteopenia . A female with a chronically negative energy balance (more calories out than in) can suffer from disruption of the normal reproductive hormonal axis. Suppression of this axis can lead to oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea. Loss of regular menstrual cycles can lead to poor bone formation and increased bone loss. This can increase one's risk of developing stress fractures and osteoporosis.
Evaluating a patient for the triad requires a comprehensive history including her exercise history, diet history, menstrual history, injury history, psychiatric history, and family history in addition to a complete physical examination and appropriate laboratory testing.
Trying to do a comprehensive evaluation for the Triad in this patient at this visit is probably not practical and will likely be frustrating for the patient and overwhelming for Dr. Hazelton. For this visit, Dr. Hazleton should use Mrs. Kellogg's concern about her heart as a springboard into future discussions regarding her overall health and lifestyle.
For this evaluation to continue, the patient will have to "buy into" her physician's concerns and recommendations at some level. Some patients with disordered eating may be secretive and ashamed of their true eating behaviors. Others believe that they have the "perfect diet" and won't understand that their good intentions may not be healthy. A simple explanation of possible health risks may be all that is needed for some patients to understand the physician's concern. Other patients will resist intervention. Dr. Hazelton should persist in expressing her concern, just as she would with a patient who continues to smoke, and, one hopes, it may eventually have an impact.
Suzanne Hecht, MD, is an assistant professor in the Departments of Family Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery at University of California, Los Angeles. Among her research interests are disordered eating behaviors in female gymnasts and divers. She is a team physician at UCLA and member of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine and the American College of Sports Medicine.
The people and events in this case are fictional. Resemblance to real events or to names of people, living or dead, is entirely coincidental. The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the AMA.
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.