|
Virtual Mentor. April 2007, Volume 9, Number 4: 295-299. Clinical Pearl Hyperkalemia: Newer ConsiderationsAmar D. Bansal and David S. Goldfarb, MD Maintenance of potassium balance is a key aspect of electrolyte homeostasis. Potassium is the major intracellular cation, and its transport in the kidneys is tightly regulated. Disruptions in potassium balance, such as severe hyperkalemia ([K+] > 8 mEq/L), can lead to cardiac abnormalities that may progress to ventricular fibrillation if untreated. A diagnosis of hyperkalemia needs to be further contextualized in order to have clinical significance. Factors to be considered when treating a patient with hyperkalemia are:
Despite our empirical understanding of the physiologic mechanisms of renal function and potassium handling, there is still no clinical consensus on how and when treatment should be administered in the setting of hyperkalemia. The absence of established medical criteria allows some room for clinical subjectivity regarding when to correct hyperkalemia. Renal physiology of potassium balance Factors other than dietary intake influence K+ homeostasis in the kidneys. Aldosterone causes increased K+ secretion by: (1) increasing the activity of Na+/K+ ATPase and (2) increasing epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) in principal cells [1]. The latter effect enhances the electrochemical gradient for K+ secretion into the lumen. Therefore, attenuated downstream effects of aldosterone due to spironolactone, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or the presence of hypoaldosteronism all lead to elevated K+ levels. Treatment of hyperkalemia When to intervene with chronic hyperkalemia remains uncertain, and as ACE inhibitors and ARBs are used more frequently in patients with chronic kidney disease, hyperkalemia is becoming more common. Is a [K+] of 5.5 mEq/L too high or dangerous? Does it require that an EKG be done? Absolute values that indicate a need for treatment or, alternatively, a benign outcome, remain uncertain. Patients with lower glomerular filtration rates (GFRs), acute reductions in GFR, or rising [K+] and those with unexplained increases in [K+] are all at greater risk than the opposite conditions. Inpatient versus outpatient management The study concluded that the clinical profiles of the patients who underwent outpatient and inpatient treatment for hyperkalemia were not significantly different. The factors examined included age, mean [K+], or other values such as serum urea nitrogen or creatinine. The indications for admission in the admitted group were not evident: they were not significantly more ill, did not have worse kidney function and did not have higher serum potassium concentrations. This result points to a lack of medical consensus on how to handle hyperkalemia. The authors suggested that inpatient treatment of hyperkalemia is clearly necessary when there is severe hyperkalemia ([K+] > 8 mM) accompanied by EKG changes, as defined by the Levinsky criteria (table 1) [3]. In this case, the inpatient setting allows for continuous cardiac monitoring. The study also indicated that hyperkalemia associated with serious conditions such as tissue catabolism, an acute decrease in renal function or drug overdose might be an indication for inpatient management. Hyperkalemia and pharmacotherapy It is important to weigh the beneficial cardio- and renoprotective effects of some of the drugs mentioned against their deleterious tendency to cause hyperkalemia [4]. Studies have shown that physicians tend to be aware of the association between hyperkalemia and use of ACE inhibitors, but awareness of the potential of NSAIDs to cause hyperkalemia is relatively poor [2]. Thus, NSAIDs should be discontinued in patients with hyperkalemia or at risk for hyperkalemia before other drugs with beneficial cardio- and renoprotective effects are discontinued. If an NSAID is absent from a patient's medications, and the drug regimen includes an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or aldosterone receptor blocker, or any combination of the three, then reductions in dosage or discontinuation of one of the agents may ameliorate hyperkalemia. ACE inhibitors and ARBs, however, have protective effects to diminish progression of chronic kidney disease, particularly in patients with proteinuria, and should be reinstituted after serum K+ concentration is corrected. Addition of furosemide may reduce blood pressure and edema while helping modulate serum K+ concentration. Special attention should be given to certain combinations of drugs, such as spironolactone or eplerenone used with an ACE inhibitor [4]. Even when used individually, these agents may cause hyperkalemia, and their concomitant use increases the likelihood of drug-induced hyperkalemia, especially in the setting of chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) Regardless of the presence of CKD, appropriate action includes dietary counseling (for example, avoidance of dried fruits, popular with the elderly for help with constipation, and salt substitutes that often contain potassium) and a review of medications that might contribute to hyperkalemia. ConclusionHyperkalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality in the current era of ACE inhibitor and ARB use. It is possible that many unnecessary ER visits, EKGs and hospitalizations result from the real anxiety that reasonable physicians experience when varying degrees of hyperkalemia are present. How to define safe, mildly elevated levels to reassure patients and physicians and avoid unneeded treatment is not obvious. While acute treatments like calcium, insulin and Kayexelate are often appropriate, long-term chronic hyperkalemia requires addressing drug choices and diet.
References
Amar D. Bansal is a second-year medical student at New York University (NYU) School of Medicine. He graduated with a BSE in bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania in 2005, where he was involved in tissue engineering research of intervertebral disc cells. He is interested in improving access to health care for those in medically underserved communities and is president of the Patient Advocacy Group at NYU. David S. Goldfarb, MD, is the clinical chief of nephrology at New York University (NYU) Medical Center, chief of the Nephrology Section at New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and a professor of medicine and physiology at NYU School of Medicine, all in New York City. Related in VMFudging an answer during clinical rounds, April 2007
The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the AMA.
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. |
||||||||||||||||